Skip to main content

Quitting as activism: Leaving as a radical form of self-love

Recently, I left a student leadership role at my institution.

This was not because of a lack of capacity

This was not because I was not capable of doing the job to a high standard

And this was not because I necessarily wanted to.

I left because the environment was draining. The space itself did not allow my personal activism to flourish and grow the way it deserves to, and no space should ever make you feel this way. 

But, this is not a time to be sad, but a time to feel empowered. 

Leaving a job post, or leaving any position that is situated in a negative, toxic environment can be an empowering experience, that reminds you of your power, and how you have autonomy over who you surround yourself with, and what you expose your body and mind to. 

I always refer back to the life-changing work of bell hooks, who writes about love, space, and relationships in such a beautiful way. 

She writes how you need to love yourself in a way that helps you spiritually grow, and your environment and the people you surround yourself do have an impact on this feeling of self-love, more so than we tend to admit. 

She reminds us that, yes, there are power structures we have to enact ourselves within, but that does not mean we can't create our own spaces that allows our self-love to thrive rather than destroying it. 

Sometimes we do need to put ourselves in difficult spaces or uncomfortable places, but you need to think about what it is for, and more importantly, is it worth it. 

For example, as a PhD researcher, I see many researchers struggling to get through their academic work, as the space is not always the most equitable, or healthy in general. But some of us stay, because we know we want to be here, and for most, we want to finish. 

But, others decide it is not worth the pain the space might bring, and that's also empowering and valid - to not let the space take over who you are, that's pretty powerful. 

Quitting can be a powerful act of self-love 

Rather than framing this as "I am so sorry that you have had to leave", perhaps we frame "I am so happy you enacted your power and removed yourself from a bad environment" 

Neoliberal capitalist society has taught us that quitting makes us weak, promoting responses like this to my news, but in this instance, that is not necessary.  

For me, the space I left was not only draining and toxic, but not worth my love and skills. I got no joy from the work, so tell me, why stay?

Yes, one needs to learn to be 'resilient' (contested term), but when that 'resilience' becomes unworthy pain, we should not hold on. 

As an activist who self-reflects on a daily basis, I have gained the ability to feel empowered by my identity and sense of self. I realise that spaces that do not make me feel loved and valued do not deserve me, and I deserve more. 

I tell students enacting their own activism as much as possible, you deserve more than you get. 

When they are feeling overwhelmed and like they have failed, a lot of the time the issue is the lack of support they get, or how they are failed to be taught how to self-reflect on how space and environments make them feel. Sometimes these negative emotions are then associated with the self, rather than outside influence. 

Institutional and organisational change requires radical activism - and that activism can be quitting.

It means you do not let that space win, you did. 

This is why I find it so important to reflect on space: Who is really the problem? Probably not you.

It's important to add also, that I left on my own terms. I did not allow for those in the space to create a narrative for me, but I heavily stated my own reasoning, this was also extremely powerful. 

I felt powerful. 

The spaces I want to find myself in are empowering ones. If a space does not allow me to be my full, authentic, activist self, I cannot stay, for that would not be loving for anyone involved. 

I encourage you to analyse and deeply think about the spaces you find yourself in on a daily basis

How do you feel? 

Why do you think that is? 

Do you feel different in one space from another? 

What are the differences between your positive and negative spaces? 

It's a journey I am still on and will be for a very long time, but I am happy it has started. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Justice is not inclusion": The difference between EDI work and justice

“You can DEI your way into equality, but you cannot DEI your way into justice" I saw this quote from Dr T. Anansi Wilson @blaqueerflow on twitter the other day and it really resonated with what my friends and I discuss quite often in regards to Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI/DEI) work and justice work  You can DEI your way into equality, maybe even equity, but you cannot DEI your way into justice. Justice is not inclusion (into a violent system), but r/evolution into a new way of organising and living and dying; resources and care; power and deservability; accountability & rest.  (This is also a thread on Twitter if you would like to see more of it) What I love about this quote is that there is a difference between EDI work and justice work. Just because someone states they are committed to justice does not mean they do the work to implement what that really means. I think it’s important to distinguish in order to carry on the conversation of who is promoting activ...

Apparently, loving Britain means hating foreigners?: Far-right racism in UK EDL ‘riots’

On August 3rd, as I walked down the street I heard a shout.  "Are you a half-caste?!" they cried.  I stood in disbelief.  They continued to ask for my identity "Are you a dirty half-caste?!" As if my ambiguous face made them confused whether I was one of them or not.  Or, as if they could not decide what racial slur to call me.  Turns out, this was an EDL white supremacist.  While still used as a common phrase in many countries, in the UK it isn't typically used in common contemporary discourse.  If you don't know, as no one has really used this slur since the 50's, 'half caste'  is a derogatory term used to refer to individuals of multiracial descent to describe their 'impure' blood. White blood that has been diluted by any non-white ethnicity.  This turned my attention to the way these EDL ‘rioters’ (aka terrorists) saw race and ethnicity.   EDL racists and their perpetuation of Eugenics  EDL stands for the English Defense Le...

New Love Island rules reveals racism in Britain

We all see it,  but why are we not talking about it?  Love Island is a popular dating TV show in the UK, which places 'attractive' contestants in a villa for a number of months, and viewers watch as they pair up to fall in and out of love. It's huge popularity is due to the levels of relationship drama the UK public love to watch, but it also reveals a lot about how racism can enact itself within dating and how the UK public views interracial couples.  The pictures are the first 'coupling' of the contestants. How this works is each contestant (either all the males or all the females) stand in a row, and the other gender group comes out one by one. The ones standing in the line step forward if they find this person attractive, and then that person chooses who they want to 'couple up with'.  This year,  these rules changed.  This time, the public were given the power to vote for who should be coupled up with who.  Now, the public are given a number of sh...